When you make the same journey a lot, you tend to start picking out details. Silly things that weren't there the day before. The people. Notices in shop windows. And, oh my God, the ever changing advertisements on the hoardings. I think this is why advertisers bother with roadside billboards... because they know that after a few weeks people stop noticing the things that are the same, and start looking out for the things that are different.
Advertising. Yeah. Lovely.
We're currently in the run-up to a General Election here in Merry England. The date hasn't been called yet - I wish they'd hurry up and do it so at least we'd know when all this irritating electioneering would be over - but we've got election posters coming out our ears at the moment. The most aggravating of these are the Conservative party's desperate attempts to appear 'in touch' by using posters which are covered in bad handwriting with populist sentiments like "Just how hard is it to keep a hospital clean" and "It's not racist to impose limits on immigration". Very nice.
Only thing is, if I remember rightly it was the Conservatives who introduced the idea of contracting out hospital services like portering, meals and yes, cleaning to private companies - the lowest bidder, in other words. Hospital cleaners are overworked, underresourced and underfunded - is it any wonder we've got problems with hospital hygiene these days? When catering, cleaning, portering and the like were run by in-house services, things weren't this bad. Now they're all run by private companies, with predictable results. Thank you, Tory party. And while it's not racist in theory to impose limits on immigration if you do it across the board, I highly doubt Michael Howard would stop immigrants from first-world countries getting jobs here if they wanted to. I bet poor Eastern Europeans, Africans and Asians couldn't say the same, though. So yes, that is racist.
The one that really got my goat was this one, though:
"How would you like it if some bloke on early release attacked your daughter."
Ouch. The latent paternalism in that one really is painful. It's as if the Tories are suggesting that the hypothetical daughter's feelings in this scenario don't matter in quite the same way as her incensed father's do. As if the woman is somehow little more than an extension of whichever man has custody of her. The subtext seems, to me, to suggest that women belong to their fathers or their husbands, not to themselves. Obviously that one wasn't aimed at women. Amazing, isn't it? Even when they're going for the populist vote the Tories shoot themselves in the foot by revealing themselves as unreconstructedly sexist. It'd be almost funny if it wasn't so sad.
This has been a Party Political broadcast from the Fangirl Party.
The other poster that's been catching my eye lately is the one for 'Miss Congeniality 2', which strikes me as one of the more useless sequels of recent years. I can't remember the first one being that popular - what about this movie was crying out for a sequel? Or is it just because Sandra Bullock (oh, Sandy... and you seemed so full of promise, too. What went wrong?) is so desperate for a paycheck she'll do anything? The poster, if memory serves, is virtually identical to the first one. Needless to say, this really doesn't bode well for the film.
If you're wondering where this update's title came from, by the way, I do actually pass a barber's shop on my way to college which also sells hats. Does anyone else think the juxtaposition is, for wont of any other word, unfortunate? I know I wouldn't go in there for a haircut if my life depended on it.
... and now I need to go eat.
Advertising. Yeah. Lovely.
We're currently in the run-up to a General Election here in Merry England. The date hasn't been called yet - I wish they'd hurry up and do it so at least we'd know when all this irritating electioneering would be over - but we've got election posters coming out our ears at the moment. The most aggravating of these are the Conservative party's desperate attempts to appear 'in touch' by using posters which are covered in bad handwriting with populist sentiments like "Just how hard is it to keep a hospital clean" and "It's not racist to impose limits on immigration". Very nice.
Only thing is, if I remember rightly it was the Conservatives who introduced the idea of contracting out hospital services like portering, meals and yes, cleaning to private companies - the lowest bidder, in other words. Hospital cleaners are overworked, underresourced and underfunded - is it any wonder we've got problems with hospital hygiene these days? When catering, cleaning, portering and the like were run by in-house services, things weren't this bad. Now they're all run by private companies, with predictable results. Thank you, Tory party. And while it's not racist in theory to impose limits on immigration if you do it across the board, I highly doubt Michael Howard would stop immigrants from first-world countries getting jobs here if they wanted to. I bet poor Eastern Europeans, Africans and Asians couldn't say the same, though. So yes, that is racist.
The one that really got my goat was this one, though:
"How would you like it if some bloke on early release attacked your daughter."
Ouch. The latent paternalism in that one really is painful. It's as if the Tories are suggesting that the hypothetical daughter's feelings in this scenario don't matter in quite the same way as her incensed father's do. As if the woman is somehow little more than an extension of whichever man has custody of her. The subtext seems, to me, to suggest that women belong to their fathers or their husbands, not to themselves. Obviously that one wasn't aimed at women. Amazing, isn't it? Even when they're going for the populist vote the Tories shoot themselves in the foot by revealing themselves as unreconstructedly sexist. It'd be almost funny if it wasn't so sad.
This has been a Party Political broadcast from the Fangirl Party.
The other poster that's been catching my eye lately is the one for 'Miss Congeniality 2', which strikes me as one of the more useless sequels of recent years. I can't remember the first one being that popular - what about this movie was crying out for a sequel? Or is it just because Sandra Bullock (oh, Sandy... and you seemed so full of promise, too. What went wrong?) is so desperate for a paycheck she'll do anything? The poster, if memory serves, is virtually identical to the first one. Needless to say, this really doesn't bode well for the film.
If you're wondering where this update's title came from, by the way, I do actually pass a barber's shop on my way to college which also sells hats. Does anyone else think the juxtaposition is, for wont of any other word, unfortunate? I know I wouldn't go in there for a haircut if my life depended on it.
... and now I need to go eat.
Current Music: tonight - weiss kreuz
Current Mood:
hungry

Leave a comment